Ultraviolet, ultra useful

Tony Leigh looks at the history of UV disinfection - and explains how recent advances have made it more effective in the battle for safe drinking water.

ULTRAVIOLET (UV) LIGHT is increasingly being used as an effective barrier for Cryptosporidium and other emerging (chlorine resistant) organisms in the UK. Many water companies are now using this technology to ensure that water leaving the treatment plant does not pose a risk to health.

Having discovered UV light in 1801, Johann Ritter was able to decompose silver chloride using light beyond the violet part of the visible spectrum. The germicidal properties of UV were recognised in 1904 with the award of the Nobel Prize in Physiology to Niels Finsen for his work in treating Lupus oulgaris (skin tuberculosis). And, by 1910, a drinking water facility using a crude UV lamp system was commissioned in Marseilles, France.

Early experiences of UV for water disinfection were poor, and the technology was not considered successful. But after the war years, advances in lamp design enabled a number of process industries such as breweries, pharmaceutical plants and fish farms to adopt the technology as a chemical free method of disinfecting process or product water.

Urban areas
Municipal use of UV in drinking water plants was limited to those facilities that used their discharge main for chlorine contact, or in uplands areas where organic loads were high. Population growth, particularly in urban areas led to the consumer being closer to the drinking water plant, and so UV systems were installed to provide immediate disinfection chlorine remains the primary disinfectant, and is used to ensure that water throughout the distribution system remains free from infection.

The ability of Cryptosporidium to survive outside a host for extended periods in the spore phase, coupled with its resistance to conventional disinfection such as chlorination has led to UV systems being installed specifically to mitigate against such threats.

The outbreak in Clitheroe, Lancashire, in 2000 caused 58 reported cases of diarrhoea. In August 2002, Glasgow experienced flooding and 140,000 people received boil water notices following detection of the organism in drinking water. In 2005, Anglesey in Wales had an outbreak with 1,000 residents contracting cryptosporidiosis.

Outbreaks continued in 2007 in Galway, Ireland, and Catterick Garrison, Yorkshire. In 2008, an outbreak re-occurred in North Wales, with 45,000 people given boil notices. In June that year, Anglian Water detected the parasite at the Pitsford Water Treatment Works, serving 250,000 people in Northamptonshire. Outbreaks of Cryptosporidium infestation are often associated with either failure (or absence) of a coagulation-filtration process, and usually absence of UV as a treatment option. So it would seem a prudent investment that UV be considered for high risk drinking water facilities, such as surface water plants, those close to livestock, or those susceptible from agriculture runoff or flooding.

The UK Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations were introduced in 2000 to implement the European Drinking Water Directive. They set out requirements for monitoring, treatment and analysis of water supplied to consumers, and establish instructions for the continuous monitoring of Cryptosporidium in drinking water.
Membranes can physically remove the oocysts from the water, but with a significant capital cost and operating cost burden monitoring and not universally treating is a detection rather than prevention approach; the growing scarcity of water and need to conserve and indeed to re-use wastewater for irrigation for example will lead to prevention rather than mere detection.

UV has the ability to destroy the DNA contained in the nucleus of all living organisms. When properly applied, UV light at wavelengths close to 260nm is absorbed by the DNA and permanent damage is caused. Once exposed to UV light, the DNA quickly stops normal cell functions, rendering the organism non viable. Replication is prevented and the organism quickly dies. No species have demonstrated an ability to become resistant to UV, unlike chemical disinfectants where a growing number of organisms have become increasingly tolerant.

Predictors
Sizing of a UV system is affected by three variables: flow rate, lamp power and transmittance of the light in the water. The leading UV companies, such as atg UV Technology and Trojan Technologies, have developed sophisticated CFD models as accurate predictors of a UV system performance.

The flow profile is produced from the chamber geometry, flow rate and particular turbulence model selected. The radiation profile is developed from inputs such as water quality, lamp type and the transmittance and dimension of the quartz sleeve.

Proprietary CFD software simulates both the flow and radiation profiles. Once the 3D model of the chamber is built, it's populated with a grid or mesh that comprises thousands of small cubes. Points of interest - such as at a bend, on the quartz sleeve surface, or around the wiper mechanism - use a higher resolution mesh, whilst other areas within the reactor use a coarse mesh. Once the mesh is produced, hundreds of thousands of virtual particles are fired through the chamber.

Each particle has variables of interest associated with it, and the particles are harvested after the reactor. Discrete phase modelling produces delivered dose, headless and other chamber specific parameters. When the modelling phase is complete, selected systems are validated using a third party to provide oversight and to determine how closely the model is able to predict system performance. System validation uses non-pathogenic surrogates to determine the Reduction Equivalent Dose (RED) ability of the reactors. Most systems are validated to deliver 40 mJ/[cm.sup.2] within an envelope of flow and transmittance.

To validate effectiveness, Ultraviolet Absorption Method 5910 B-00 is the standard method used by the US Environmental Protection Agency, whilst Europe is adopting this alongside Germany's DVGW 294 standard. The models are then used to guide installation, and show the detrimental effect of locating a bend or valve on fluid flow patterns.

Tony Leigh is technical director at atg UV Technology. T: 01942 216161

Tags



Topics


Click a keyword to see more stories on that topic, view related news, or find more related items.

Comments

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Don't have an account? Set one up right now in seconds!


© Faversham House Group Ltd 2009. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.