|
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Channel Homepages
» Home
» Sustainable Business » Green Buildings » Contaminated Land » Water/Wastewater » Waste/Recycling » Energy/Carbon » edie Ireland » Resource Centres » Sustainabilitylive! Site SponsorTo see all site sponsors, click here
Supplier Links» Air Pollution Control» Waste Management » Renewable Energy - Point Of Use » Recycling & Recovery » Air Gas and Particle Monitoring » Climate Change and Low Carbon |
4 May 2006 Waste-to-energy not climate friendly, research shows Mountains of rubbish: the Government is currently reviewing the UK's long-term waste strategy Getting energy from burning waste in incinerators produces 33% more greenhouse gases than burning coal in power stations, according to research published by Friends of the Earth on Wednesday. Despite this, waste companies and Government alike promote it as a "green" way of dealing with rubbish. FOE's waste campaigner Dr Michael Warhurst said: "The Government and waste industry must stop peddling the myth that waste incineration is green energy. Incinerators can generate electricity, but they produce more climate emissions than a gas-fired power station." The environmental group released the report entitled A changing climate for energy from waste as the consultation period on the Government's long-term waste strategy (see related story) comes to a close. While the strategy aims is to "reduce the impact of waste on climate change," it proposes an increase in the proportion of waste incinerated from 9% to around 27% by 2020. As we get better at recycling and the proportion of burned plastics decreases, fossil fuel-derived CO2 released from burning waste is likely to fall. But the report estimates that by 2020 incinerators will still be almost as polluting in CO2 terms as new coal-fired power stations, and 78% worse than gas-fired ones, taking changes to technology and recycling into account. "The Government must make it clear that they will not support the building of such polluting plants. Using these incinerators to produce energy will undermine Government attempts to tackle climate change. Ministers must back truly renewable energy sources instead," said Dr. Warhurst. The report says the Government should invest in greener waste-to-energy methods instead, such as anaerobic digestion, a process by which methane is produced from kitchen and commercial food waste, and burnt as fuel to produce energy. The full report commissioned by FOE from Eunomia Consulting can be accessed here. The Government's waste strategy review can be accessed here. Goska Romanowicz Source: edie newsroom
This story is tagged as:
energy from waste | waste Click on a keyword to see more stories on that topic Share this
© Faversham House Group Ltd 2006. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded
for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
 You are notlogged in » Log in here Why not register for your free weekly newsletter? Related Stories The preferred bidders to build a new incinerator and revamp recycling sites in Peterborough have been announced.» Appeal over blocked incinerator The firm behind a plan for an incinerator capable of turning 300,000 tonnes of waste a year into power have vowed to appeal after it was thrown out by councillors.» London waste officials back gasification plant for capital London is to get a major waste processing plant that will showcase what is currently one of the most efficient methods of transforming waste into energy.» Scots admit to 'uncertainties' on health implications of incineration A report for the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) has found 'too many uncertainties' make it difficult to rule on the effects on human health of incineration.
Related Media» The RecycleBank JourneyTerry Gould from the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Meeta Gourney UK director of RecycleBank explain how the scheme is working.
» Waste by WaterMark Benstead director of regeneration at British Waterways talks about boosting the use of the nations waterways for recycling.
» WRAP on behaviour changeWRAP's chief executive, Liz Goodwin, on behaviour change.
» See more
|
Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Other Faversham House Websites include
Environment Awards | Desalination & Water Reuse | Builders Merchants Journal | web4water
Environment Awards | Desalination & Water Reuse | Builders Merchants Journal | web4water
» Discussion - Can we cut building emissions fast enough to meet targets?
» Discussion - Will energy meters cut climate change or are they a gimmick?