|
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Channel Homepages
» Home
» Sustainable Business » Green Buildings » Contaminated Land » Water/Wastewater » Waste/Recycling » Energy/Carbon » edie Ireland » Resource Centres » Sustainabilitylive! Site SponsorTo see all site sponsors, click here
Supplier Links» Air Pollution Control» Financial Services » Climate Change and Low Carbon » Corporate Social Responsibility |
18 October 2006 UK aviation policy will wipe out climate change effort - report The airline industry says that 'most people have concerns about climate change but want to keep flying' By 2050 aviation will be contributing up to two-thirds of the Government's total carbon dioxide emission target if demand continues to grow uncontrolled, even taking technological and air traffic management improvements into account - the researchers calculate. Although aviation still only accounts for about 5.5% of the UK's total emissions, it is the fastest growing greenhouse gas source - and the international nature of the industry makes it one of the most elusive to control. Britain could make a significant difference to global emissions as a key player in the international airline industry, with a fifth of all international passengers on flights that pass through the UK. The Government's current policy fully supports airport expansion on a scale that would see passenger movements doubling by 2030, from an annual 200m in 2003 up to 470m. Overall, policy on aviation 'flies in the face' of climate change policy, said the authors of the study, commissioned by the Government-funded UK Energy Research Centre. Dr Brenda Boardman of Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute, who led the research, said: "The Government has to confront the contradictions in its policies. "Unless the rate of growth in flights is curbed, the UK cannot fulfil its commitments on climate change. If government wants to be confident about achieving its targets, it has to undertake demand management. Relying on technological fixes alone is totally unrealistic," she said. The Government continues to put forward the idea of including aviation in the European ETS as the main solution to growing aircraft emissions. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is also the solution advanced by the airline lobby, which vehemently opposes raising air passenger duty. Conversely, the authors of the "Predict and Decide" report advocate higher taxes as the preferred solution, which they said would be quicker and easier to implement than emissions trading for aircraft. British Air Transport Association (BATA) said it supported the inclusion of airlines in the EU ETS, adding that "most people have concerns about climate change but want to keep flying and do not see taxation as a solution." Roger Wiltshire, BATA secretary general said that Britain needs the infrastructure to support the growth in demand. Budget carrier Easyjet dismissed national taxes as ineffective and 'discriminating': "Taxation is a blunt instrument that will only put more money into the pockets of Governments, whilst discriminating against the poorest in society, who until recently were priced out of the sky," it said in response to the University of Oxford report. But the report disputed the claim that cheap flights make foreign travel more accessible to lower social classes. Flight decks continue to be dominated by the three highest socio-economic classes, the researchers found. They said that most of the recent growth in passenger numbers is not down to more people flying, but the same people - mainly from the better-off sections of society - flying more often. "There is little evidence that the less well-off are really benefiting from the low price of air travel," the report states. Dr Sally Cairns, one of the authors from the Transport Research Laboratory, said: "If the government wants to reduce aviation growth, it has the power to act now. Raising air passenger duty would help to counter reductions in fares - which are estimated to have been responsible for at least 40 per cent of recent aviation growth.' Co-author, Carey Newson, said: 'Opinion polls should encourage the government to revisit its aviation policy. A majority now favour airlines paying higher taxes to reflect environmental damage, even if this means higher airfares.' Curbing the growth in flights would not necessarily hurt the UK economy as other sectors, such as the domestic tourism industry, could benefit, the report concluded. The full report can be accessed here at Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute website. Goska Romanowicz Source: edie newsroom
This story is tagged as:
aviation | climate change | government Click on a keyword to see more stories on that topic Share this
© Faversham House Group Ltd 2006. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded
for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
 You are notlogged in » Log in here Why not register for your free weekly newsletter? Related Stories The Canadian province of Ontario has passed legislation that will allow it to set up a cap-and-trade scheme that could link up with others already established in North America.» South Africa pledges significant emissions cuts South Africa has become the latest major economy to put a carbon-cutting pledge on the table at Copenhagen.» Carbon targets 'could be met through tax reforms' A think tank set up two years ago to look into the viability of financial reforms that encourage green behaviour has published its findings.» Europe offers formal support for Copenhagen Accord The EU has formalised its backing for the Copenhagen Accord telling the UN that it sees the limited agreement that came out of December's COP15 meeting as the 'first step towards a legally binding agreement for climate protection as of 2012'.
Related Media» The RecycleBank JourneyTerry Gould from the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Meeta Gourney UK director of RecycleBank explain how the scheme is working.
» Waste by WaterMark Benstead director of regeneration at British Waterways talks about boosting the use of the nations waterways for recycling.
» WRAP on behaviour changeWRAP's chief executive, Liz Goodwin, on behaviour change.
» See more
|
Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Other Faversham House Websites include
Builders Merchants Journal | water-waste-environment-marketplace
Builders Merchants Journal | water-waste-environment-marketplace
» Discussion - Can we cut building emissions fast enough to meet targets?
» Discussion - Will energy meters cut climate change or are they a gimmick?