edie Home Page
Search edie for
Conference
About us   Feedback   Register   Contact   Advertise   Editorial   Finditforme   Publications   Partners   Links   Discussions   Quiz

Channel Homepages


Site Sponsor

To see all site sponsors, click here



  12 September 2007  

Eat your veg - health benefits outweigh pesticide concerns

The doctor who heads up a national committee charged with investigating the levels of pesticide in the foods we are sold has said he understands there is a degree of public concern over chemical contamination, but the benefits of getting your five a day outweigh the dangers.

Speaking at the Festival of Science at the University of York this week, Dr Ian Brown, chairman of the Pesticide Residues Committee, said that the organisation had completed its analysis of food samples taken in 2006.

The ongoing survey looks at food produced in the UK and those imported from outside its borders.

Around two thirds of the foods tested showed no traces of the pesticides which concern the committee, while 1.7% of the samples had levels of chemicals above the legal safe limit.

"The results of the 2006 monitoring programme show we did not detect pesticide residues in 65.2% of the food we sampled and 1.7% contained residues above the permitted maximum levels," said Dr Brown.

"We carried out full risk assessments of these cases, which included looking at the most vulnerable people such as children and the elderly. This year, as in all recent years, nearly all the residues we found were not likely to affect people's health.

"However, we must follow up any problems we identify to maintain the high standards of protection we currently have.

"I can understand that some people have concerns about pesticide residues in their food, but as a doctor I cannot overemphasise the importance of continuing to eat at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day. Scientific evidence shows that the health benefits far outweigh any concerns about pesticide residues."

3,562 samples of both imported and UK produced food were collected in 2006 from many sources including shops, markets, ports and wholesale suppliers and tested for a wide range of different pesticides.

Results were published every three months and then summarised at the end of the year in this annual report.

As well as detailing the results of the monitoring programme the report provides information about the role of the independent committee and their work throughout 2006.

The committee meets in York four times a year. Every year they hold an open meeting where members of the public join them to discuss pesticide residues in food.

The annual report and the quarterly reports can be viewed on the PRC website.

David Gibbs
Source: edie newsroom

Email  Send to a friend   Print  Printer friendly   Print  Link to this page

This story is tagged with: food | health | pesticides
Click a keyword to see more stories on that topic, or view all related news?

del.icio.us digg technorati cosmos blinklist reddit newsvine nowpublic stumbleUpon Add to diigo Add to LinkedIn Retweet this on Twitter Facebook


There are no comments - why not make one?



You need to be logged in to make a comment. Don't have an account? Set one up right now in seconds!



© Faversham House Group Ltd 2007. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.






Related Stories

» UK to consult on sustainable pesticides
The UK Government has launched a consultation on how to put into action European rules on sustainable pesticides.
» Genetic crops cause huge rise in pesticides
Genetically engineered crops have caused a 383m pound rise in the use of pesticides in the US from 1996 to 2008, according to a new Organic Centre report.
» US pesticides to be tested for gender bending chemicals
Pesticides used in the USA are to be screened for the first time to see if they might be disrupting the reproductive systems of humans and animals.
» Monsanto stung with highest ever civil penalty for GM misbranding
Agribusiness giant Monsanto is to pay a multi-million dollar penalty for misbranding violations relating to genetically engineered pesticides.

Related Media

» Flash Floods and Hot Cities
Louise Burfitt-Dons asks if our hot cities are ready for flash floods.
» Sustainabilitylive! 2010
» Louise Burfitt-Dons on Lomborg
Why two people stormed out of the RSA
» See more


Conference
About us   Feedback   Register   Contact   Advertise   Editorial   Finditforme   Publications   Partners   Links   Discussions   Quiz

Channels
Sustainable Business
Green Buildings
Contaminated Land
Water/Wastewater
Waste/Recycling
Energy/Carbon

FHG
Resource Centres
Anaerobic Digestion & Biogas
Green Retail
Edie Legal
CRC - Carbon Reduction Commitment
Sustainable Schools
Copenhagen COP 15

Partner Microsites
ABB On Stream
Other Faversham House Websites
FHG Media
edie.net Suppliers
Environment Awards
DIY Week
ACR-News
web4water
Builders Merchants Journal
Heating and Ventilating Review
HousewaresLive
edie Ireland
Desalination & Water Reuse
Local Authority Waste & Recycling