|
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Channel Homepages
» Home
» Sustainable Business » Green Buildings » Contaminated Land » Water/Wastewater » Waste/Recycling » Energy/Carbon » edie Ireland » Resource Centres » Sustainabilitylive! Site SponsorTo see all site sponsors, click here
Supplier Links» Air Pollution Control» Environmental Monitoring and Analysis » Air Gas and Particle Monitoring » Health & Safety » Climate Change and Low Carbon |
26 August 2004 Full impact of global warming masked by air pollutionSpeaking at the 13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection congress, Professor Meinrat Andreae of the Max Planck Institute in Germany said that the presence of aerosol gases in the atmosphere could have actually been protecting the earth from feeling the full force of climate change (see related story). Research conducted by Professor Andreae shows that a cooling effect caused by aerosols in the air, which scatter light back to space, could have reduced the acceleration of the warming effect on the earth. However, this would simply be delaying the catastrophic end results of climate change. "Warming will be especially fast if large aerosol cooling has hidden a higher climate sensitivity than has been generally assumed," he said. "Aerosols may have protected us from greenhouse warming, but their protection will wane while greenhouse gases keep growing." Professor Andreae warned that even a small probability of such negative outcomes made it vital that there was a radical and immediate reduction in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide: "We cannot afford to be complacent. If climate sensitivity is as high as the work on aerosol effects is suggesting, then climate change in the 21st century may well exceed the current estimates of global warming. This difference could be as different as that between the Ice Age and today's global climate conditions." Director of Friends of the Earth, Tony Juniper, was concerned by the report and agreed that action urgently needed to be taken worldwide to tackle the problem: "Suggestions that climate change may be a bigger threat than previously thought are deeply disturbing. Unless the world wakes up to the threat, millions of people across the planet may suffer the consequences."
By Jane Kettle
Source: edie newsroom
This story is tagged as:
air pollution | global warming Click on a keyword to see more stories on that topic © Faversham House Group Ltd 2004. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded
for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
You are notlogged in » Log in here Why not register for your free weekly newsletter? Related Stories Edie's Awards for Environmental Excellence is to expand this year with the addition of new category looking to find the best projects in sustainable transport. » Funding to find missing bees Scientists fear food shortages unless 'critical' research into falling honeybee populations discovers the reason behind dwindling numbers.» Unregistered asbestos removers fined thousands Workmen who ripped out asbestos in a school without the proper permits have been fined.» Emissions from aviation industry must be cut ahead of Copenhagen Goverment must work towards capping global airline emissions, according to an influential lobbying group.
Related Media» The RecycleBank JourneyTerry Gould from the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Meeta Gourney UK director of RecycleBank explain how the scheme is working.
» Waste by WaterMark Benstead director of regeneration at British Waterways talks about boosting the use of the nations waterways for recycling.
» WRAP on behaviour changeWRAP's chief executive, Liz Goodwin, on behaviour change.
» See more
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |


Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment


















» Discussion - Can we cut building emissions fast enough to meet targets?
» Discussion - Will energy meters cut climate change or are they a gimmick?