|
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Channel Homepages
» Home
» Sustainable Business » Green Buildings » Contaminated Land » Water/Wastewater » Waste/Recycling » Energy/Carbon » edie Ireland » Resource Centres » Sustainabilitylive! Site SponsorTo see all site sponsors, click here
|
14 January 2005 Sustainability must be in hearts and minds of governmentThe government's attempts to modernise public services will not be successful unless it pays more attention to environmental issues, social justice and quality of life, according to Sharing the value: A sustainable approach to the modernisation agenda. By using sustainable development as a baseline for its agenda, the government would be able to guarantee long-term improvements to public services, as well as real benefits for tax payers, the report states. "With G8 and the EU Presidency coming up, this is a vital year for the government, but you can't have a huge global campaign for sustainable change and development if you do not have sustainability at the heart of your domestic agenda," Jonathon Porritt, chairman of the SDC told edie. "What's needed is an effort to get some seriously joined-up thinking between international and domestic policies." As well as providing greater value for money both for the long and short terms, the SDC report points out that integrating sustainable development into the government's modernisation programme would also bring a better balance between economic, environmental and social benefits, rather than crude trade-offs. "Looking at best practice, we know how much money and energy can be saved, and the difference between best practice and bog-standard practice, both in terms of construction and operation, is still enormous," Mr Porritt explained. The UK currently has half a dozen iconic examples of sustainable construction, but Mr Porritt said that if it could be done once, then constructing sustainable, energy-efficient buildings should now become the standard, not the rare exception. "Thousands of tonnes of carbon emissions could be saved, and by employing best practice, the government would be sending an extremely strong signal to the construction industry," he continued. "The government must use its huge power as a central procurement agency to send signals through the public and private sectors." Environmental benefits of integrating sustainable development into government policies would include a direct reduction in energy consumption and material flows. Indirectly, carbon emissions would also be reduced by more energy efficient buildings, as well as by a better public transport system that would cut down heavy dependency on cars. "The government needs to think in an integrated way," Mr Porritt added. "The public sector must be obliged to operate in an environmentally responsible manner. It is wrong that, for instance, healthcare facilities at the NHS get off the hook when companies in the private sector are becoming more heavily regulated and forced to do more to reduce their environmental impact." "We have suggested in the report that the healthcare commission and the NHS are given a new management programme so that they also become 'good corporate citizens', managing all their facilities with an eye to reducing environmental and social impacts, as well as becoming an exemplar of sustainable development to the rest of the sector." Despite admissions from Environment Minister Elliot Morley towards the end of last year that the public sector would be led by example from the inside out on sustainable procurement and development (see related story), Mr Porritt told edie that he felt the government was holding fire for the announcement of its new strategy, which is due to be unveiled on 1 March 2005. "Sustainable procurement will be integral to the new strategy, which has a much stronger push on sustainable procurement, for local authorities and government departments alike, improving guidelines and support," he said. "But the government needs to stick to its guns - sustainability must become a mainstream imperative, not an afterthought."
By Jane Kettle
Source: edie newsroom © Faversham House Group Ltd 2005. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded
for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
You are notlogged in » Log in here Why not register for your free weekly newsletter? Related Stories Four communities in southern England are to share £60m of Government cash to build 'eco show homes' as part of the wider ecotowns agenda.» Weak ETS needs tightening to be effective - EAC The Environmental Audit Commission has published its third report on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme in which it blasts the mechanism for being too loose to be effective and calls for a 'significant' tightening of caps.» CBI wants national energy efficiency plan by June The UK is being too slow in transforming to a low carbon economy and a major energy efficiency drive would be the quickest and most effective way to get back on track.» Ontario edges towards cap and trade The Canadian province of Ontario has passed legislation that will allow it to set up a cap-and-trade scheme that could link up with others already established in North America.
Related Media» Fashioning the FutureThe London School of Fashion recently held the 'Fashioning the Future' award for the second year in a row.
College head Dr Francis Corner tells edie about the awards and why sustainability is com...
» Greenpeace unleashes the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse in CopenhagenGreenpeace campaigners say climate change will bring war, famine, pestilence and death to the world.
» Sea Change At CopenhagenLouise Burfitt-Dons expects a sea change at Copenhagen next week
» See more
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
FHG Media | Copenhagen Climate Talks, COP15 News | edie Ireland | Heating and Ventilating Review | Environment Awards | DIY Week | ACR-News


Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment


















» Discussion - Can we cut building emissions fast enough to meet targets?
» Discussion - Will energy meters cut climate change or are they a gimmick?