Deep tunnels finally reach Stonecutter

Fourteen years ago Hong Kong embarked on a massive and radical scheme to deal with the problems of handling the sewage and wastewater from its rapidly expanding population.


Continue Reading

Login or register for unlimited FREE access.

Login Register

The major urban areas of Hong Kong lie on either side of the channel between

Hong Kong Island and Kowloon peninsula, which houses much of the industrial

activity.

In 1987 the government commissioned a study which resulted in three key recommendations:

legislation to control the quality of industrial wastes at source; upgrading

of local sewerage systems; and, most important, the provision of a comprehensive

sewerage network.

World’s deepest outfall

This Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme (SSDS) was based on the construction of

a series of tunnels deep in the rock to intercept and transport the sewage from

the existing smaller works to two primary treatment works.

In the early ’90s the project was divided into four phases. Stage I consisted

of tunnels from the north east point of Hong Kong Island along the southern

and western edge of Kowloon, to a new sewage treatment plant on Stonecutter

Island, off the western coast. After treatment, effluent would be discharged

initially through an outfall to the west, but Stage II covered construction

of a long sea outfall to the south. Stages III and IV related to a further series

of deep tunnels along the northern coast of Hong Kong Island, plus a second

sewage treatment plant housed in a series of caverns.

The Drainage Services Department of the Hong Kong Government was given responsibility

for carrying out the scheme, aided by Montgomery Watson as consulting engineers

Land is not easy to come by in Hong Kong, and the site of the first of the

new sewage treatment plants was limited to 10.6 ha. There was insufficient room

for conventional sedimentation tanks, and it was proposed that the works should

utilise an innovative system of 38 two-tray sedimentation tanks, each 60m long

by 7m wide, and capable of handling a surface loading rate of 60 m3/m2 per day.

Lime dosing to deal with toxic metal contamination from the many small industries

in the Kowloon area was also considered, but by ’94/95, CEPT using ferric chloride

was employed as the permanent process for treating Stage I flow.

The SWT works on Stonecutter Island were commissioned in mid-1997, and by June

1999 the 1,750m long interim outfall tunnel had also been completed. Lying about

90m below the seabed this tunnel culminates in twin 3.25 m dia. riser shafts

through which the effluent rises to a seabed pipeline equipped with a series

of 24 diffusers.

Construction constraints

Construction of the network of deep collection and transfer tunnels to the new

SWT was to prove less straightforward.

The Stage I tunnel, 23.5m in overall length, was divided into six sections,

and lies some 80-150m below the surface. With the exception of the most northerly

section which was constructed in drill and blast, all have been built using

tunnel boring machines to minimise surface disruption.

The six sections were grouped into two contracts, both of which were won by

a joint venture of the French company Campenon Bernard and Maeda of Japan, with

fixed price bids of HK$490M and HK$694M. The contracts were awarded at the end

of December 1994, with a completion date of mid-1997, and the contractor began

work on 3 January 1995.

Disputes and delays

Progress, however, was disappointingly slow. As work fell further and further

behind schedule relations between the Drainage Services Department and contractor

became increasingly strained. The situation came to a head in mid-summer 1996,

when the contractor stopped work, complaining that water inflows were much worse

than had been allowed for, and it would be dangerous to continue. Prolonged

negotiations failed to sort out the situation, and in December the contractor

was removed from site.

The Drainage Services Department found itself faced with several tunnels in

various stages of completion. The six tunnels were split into three contracts,

and new bids were called from all those who had earlier expressed interest in

the project.

Skanska took over the northern two, the central sections going to a joint venture

of Gammon Construction and Kvaerner, and the most southerly sections being carried

out by a joint venture of Paul Y Construction and Societa Esecuzione Lavori

Idraulica SpA of Italy.

Stage I tunnels are now nearing completion, and by the end of this year it

is expected that the sewage treatment works on Stonecutters Island, which has

up to now been processing only about 25% of the anticipated flow, will be receiving

its full design capacity.

The initial slow progress, negotiating procedures, rebidding process, and the

necessary overhaul and refurbishment of the equipment which the new contractors

were taking over has, however, inevitably led to serious delays, and costs,

which were originally estimated at HK$6.8BN lion are currently up to HK$8.3BN.

Even at an earlier stage in the project there had been complaints from some

groups that the levels of treatment proposed in the SSDS were insufficient,

and criticisms of the Stage II proposal for a long sea outfall, which would

have been the longest and deepest in the world. The delays, high costs and technical

difficulties being experienced on the Stage I tunnels have added weight to the

argument.

Following a second look at the scheme, an International Review Panel was set

up to review the possible options, based on experience with Stage I.

The IRP reported on 30 November last year with new recommendations, suggesting

that tertiary treatment facilities could be incorporated at the Stonecutter

Island STW by using biological aerated filters (BAF). If this was done, effluent

could be safely discharged through the existing outfall and the long sea outfall

to the ocean south of Lamma Island would not be needed.

The panel also reviewed four options which combined a revised network of deep

tunnels, BAFs and short outfalls for the later stages. This revised strategy

would, suggested the IRP, result in faster completion and lower construction

costs than the original proposals. The panel also suggested that a Design, Build

and Operate approach be adopted for these subsequent works.

The report has been considered by Hong Kong’s Legislative Council, which has

taken a generally open- minded view of the proposals. However, it has announced

that before making any further moves, some assumptions need to be tested – in

particular the effectiveness of BAF technology with Hong Kong’s saline sewage

and, the levels of treatment needed to eliminate the need for the long sea outfall.

Cost implications, the availability of land, and long-term effectiveness also

have to be considered.

In March this year the Government of HKSAR announced it would invite manufacturers

to offer pilot plant and a series of studies to assess the implications of the

IRP’s suggestions will be set up. The tests are expected to take about two years.

It also announced that it was dropping the term Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme

as no longer appropriate. The project has been renamed the Harbour Area Treatment

Scheme or HATS.

Even working at only 25% of the anticipated flow, the plant on Stonecutter

Island has been treating about 320,000m3/day of sewage, and reducing the suspended

solids load to Victoria Harbour from 53 to 10t/day. When the Stage I tunnels

are finally completed later this year, some 70% of the sewage entering Victoria

Harbour will be being treated, and studies have been put in place to deal with

the remainder.

© Faversham House Ltd 2022 edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.

Action inspires action. Stay ahead of the curve with sustainability and energy newsletters from edie

Subscribe