You have reached your free article views limit.

You can login or register for an account to continue viewing edie content.

Login Register

edie at 20: Despite the idiocy that is Brexit, we can do it

The people who believed that the earth was flat hung on for years to their beliefs despite mounting evidence and overwhelming acceptance of a round globe by the scientific world. Ingenious and ever more far-fetched explanations were invented to discount the navigational reports and the astronomical calculations that proved the scientific point.

The flat-earthers simply couldn’t bear to be wrong. In an exact parallel, the climate nay-sayers are still around. However, although given occasional credence by the BBC and a few contrarian journalists, their direct influence is now found only in the US. Their lasting impact here is that they have spawned the self-styled luke-warmers who present a very English compromise – admitting that global warming is happening but suggesting it’s not as bad as the scientists make out. They paint the scientific mainstream as alarmist and seek to muddy the waters by suggesting that so much is still in doubt that we should not take extensive measures now to deal with the threat but delay until we have greater certainty.

This is, of course, a convenient stance that avoids hard decisions or long-term commitments. It relies on a limited acquaintance with the facts and the propensity for the cultured and comfortable to eschew enthusiasm, confuse moderation and indifference, and thus act as a drag on the urgent action which reality increasingly demands. Without the institutional continuum created by the Climate Change Act, these would have been the people who dictated the pace of Britain’s response to global warming. Instead for ten years, Governments of all hues have maintained a fixity of policy which is unique in our post-war history. Five carbon budgets have been set by the independent Climate Change Committee (CCC) and all five have been accepted by Parliament without amendment.

We have therefore a programme reaching forward to 2032 which is statutorily enforceable and that cannot be changed unless the CCC say such a change is necessary. This year we start to formulate the 6th carbon budget. All this gives unprecedented certainty to business and civil society and is a format which is increasingly copied in other countries. With the Paris Accord coming into force, there is no doubt of the direction of travel for the UK and the wider world. Of course, there will be ups and downs. Countries will over promise and under deliver. The necessary ratcheting mechanism will not be easy to enforce and the measurement of success will always be contested. Yet, overall we can now say that humanity is on a journey to save ourselves and our planet from the disaster we had almost made inevitable.

And it is essential that we recognise just how momentous have been the steps we have already taken. It is so easy to recognise the failures and bemoan the backsliding and that disillusion can be just as powerful a stop to action as the luke-warmers with their ‘better not yet’ philosophy. Who would have believed ten years ago that Britain would be well on the way to the decarbonisation of our electricity generation, that a Chancellor would have allowed £7.6bn to be spent to do it, and that we now have the most successful offshore wind industry in the world? Who would have dared hope that Britain in Europe would have led the world to Kyoto and then on to the Paris Agreement? Indeed who would have forecast the ground-breaking extent of Paris and the almost universal support it has engendered?

So we know we can do it! Despite the idiocy that is Brexit we can do it! We also know it won’t be easy and that the luke-warmers will continue to advise caution and find reasons for delay. Yet time is of the essence as recent weather patterns remind. Almost all the hottest years in recorded history have occurred since 2000. No one incidence can be put down to climate change but the pattern is unmistakable evidence. A single UK example will suffice. In Brogdale in Kent, we hold the nation’s apple collection. 2100 different apple cultivars presided over by the University of Reading.

They have detailed records since 1960 which make frightening reading. Not only has the mean temperature risen by one degree in less than 60 years but, as a whole, the orchards bud 17 days earlier. ‘The time is out of joint’, There is an increasing danger that pollinators will emerge too late for the flowers that depend upon them. Already the winters are often too mild to kill the pests and diseases which so easily devastate our crops. That’s with one degree and here in the UK – perhaps the most fortunately placed country in the world. Double that and apply it to countries already more exposed and the disastrous effects of climate change within a few years become increasingly clear.

There is no time to lose. That’s why the Climate Change Committee was so clear in its annual advice to Government. We are not going fast enough. We have to transform our car fleet, not in 2040 but closer to 2030; we have to raise our house building standards now and not, as Mrs May encouragingly proposed by 2030; we must institute a major effort on energy efficiency for our current  housing stock; and we need to use farm payments reform to drive far-reaching agricultural action to reduce emissions.

The programme is clear and without it, we will not reach the 4th and 5th Carbon budgets which are legally binding. The good news is that it can be done and done without damaging our economy which has grown over 70% while our emissions have fallen by 40%. These measures will create jobs and growth, not stifle them. But climate change won’t wait at our convenience. The luke-warmers are as wrong as the deniers. There is no time to lose if we are going to succeed in the war to stop and ultimately reverse global warming.

© Faversham House Ltd 2022 edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.

Comments (4)

  1. chris yarrow says:

    Well said! This success storey ought to be shouted from the roof-tops, to allow the doubters to be able to join in as part of a consensus. However, the government still pursues short-term objectives.
    Isn’t it time to put airport expansion on hold until bio-fuel or hydrogen can power planes? Also, to reintroduce the fuel levy, back-dated until when it was frozen. That would encourage thrifty motoring, as well as raising much needed taxes from the petrolheads.

  2. Craig ILIFFE says:

    Well said.

    I speak as a Chartered engineer who resigned from Gas turbine design at Rolls-Royce to install solar pv systems and now also design wave energy converters:

    I feel like the best course of action is to decarbonise the national grid as it is the low hanging fruit. Transport is a very challenging problem to solve as vehicles (air land and sea) need to carry their fuel – the combustion engine (IC and Gas turbine) has an incredible power to weight ratio which is why it works so well in transport.
    I suggest focusing on all static energy consumption through improved efficiency and decarbonisation of the supply of energy. Heating and electricity are the easiest ones to solve and are huge chunks of our overall energy consumption.

  3. Rod Mountain says:

    Rod Mountain 08.08.18
    As an environmental scientist, I have to say ‘well said.’
    But I would be more urgent in my message, knowing as I do the actual ( more pressing ) temperature rises as measured by 5000 universities globally.

    I have spent the last 10 years enabling the installation of technologies ‘green.’
    In the same year that we nearly gave Greece Euros 10,000,000,000 to bail them out, the UK government could have spent this money donating 100,000 solar PV systems each 100kW in size! This legacy would be saving global CO2 emissions for decades.

    Anyone working in the renewables industry will know what I mean when I say UK governments of all colour have been uncommitted /ambivalent /half-hearted when it comes to energy policy.

    So – needlessly we continue to have to buy coal and gas from abroad ( balance of payments deficit ) and seem to need foreign money to build what the world will surely judge in the future as the biggest ever white elephant: Hinkley Nuclear – giving a wholesale price of 9p per unit!

    We could be forgiven for thinking that May and Rudd have succumbed to the pressures of Brexit and turned into what John Gummer correctly calls flat-earthers!

  4. patrick wilkinson says:

    Well said indeed, Climate change has to be the most important issue that the Government is facing today, but appears to be somewhat half-hearted in its response, exemplified by giving P.P. for fracking to go ahead, why would you do that when sensible investment in renewables makes more economic sense as well as environmental.
    The Government is still too deeply embedded with the oil lobby to say they are committed to dealing with climate change, we should be on a war footing it is that important, tipping points are getting extremely close and will not be reversed. Come on Lord Deben shout louder please we are depending on you

Action inspires action. Stay ahead of the curve with sustainability and energy newsletters from edie

Subscribe