Hundreds of scientists call on PR and advertising firms to drop fossil fuel clients

More than 450 scientists have called on the PR and advertising sectors to stop the spread of disinformation in relation to the climate crisis, with a specific call for organisations to stop enabling fossil fuel giants to mislead the public on green claims.


Continue Reading

Login or register for unlimited FREE access.

Login Register

Hundreds of scientists call on PR and advertising firms to drop fossil fuel clients

Recent analysis from the Guardian found that more than one in five climate-related ads on Google search engines “were placed by companies with significant interests in fossil fuels”.

Through the Clean Creatives campaigning organisation, more than 450 scientists have issued a letter that calls on PR and advertising agencies to introduce measures to stop the spread of climate “disinformation”.

Led by scientists including Dr. Jason Box, Dr. Astrid Caldas, Dr. Peter Gleick, Dr. Ayana Elizabeth Johnson, Dr. Michael Mann, Dr. Kate Marvel and Dr. Katharine Wilkinson, the letter warns that fossil fuel companies are working with these agencies to spread misinformation about their own approaches to sustainability.

“As scientists who study and communicate the realities of climate change, we are consistently faced with a major and needless challenge: overcoming advertising and PR efforts by fossil fuel companies that seek to obfuscate or downplay our data and the risks posed by the climate crisis,” the letter states.

Scientists are calling on the agencies to drop fossil fuel clients that plan to expand the production of oil and gas. Recent analysis from the Guardian found that more than one in five climate-related ads on Google search engines “were placed by companies with significant interests in fossil fuels”.

Dropping clients

The letter was sent just days after the world’s largest PR firm, Edelman pledged to only work with clients committed to accelerating the net-zero transition going forward and to following climate science.

Edelman has confirmed new sustainability-related requirements for clients. It has pledged to only work with organisations “committed to accelerating action to net-zero, in compliance with the Paris Agreement”, and with organisations that “put science and facts first” on all ESG matters, including climate. Clients must also have robust diversity and inclusivity policies and be committed to a just transition to net-zero.

However, campaign organisation Clean Creatives, which had been calling on Edelman to cut ties with all fossil fuel clients, says the firm’s new commitments are still not strong enough. 

“Edelman said that they will use the best available science to evaluate whether they will continue to work with fossil fuel clients,” Clean Creatives’ campaign director Duncan Meisel said.

“Well, here are 450 of the world’s best scientists telling firms like Edelman that work needs to cease immediately. Edelman wants to confuse the issue, but these climate experts are crystal clear: there are no excuses for continuing to greenwash fossil fuel companies.” 

Edelman is not the only major B2B firm facing climate-related pressure. Clean Creatives has also ranked WPP and Dentsu as laggards on ending work with big polluters. Separately, McKinsey & Company last autumn received an open letter, signed by more than 1,000 of its employees, calling for the firm to disclose the emissions generated by clients and to introduce stricter climate-related requirements for clients.

Clean Creatives will be sending the scientist letter to other top PR and advertising agencies including Edelman, WPP, and IPG. They will also be sending it to some of the agencies’ largest sustainability oriented clients, companies like Unilever, Amazon, Microsoft, North Face and more. 

The letter alludes to previous studies published in the scientific journal Climatic Change late last year that identified hundreds of campaigns by PR, advertising and marketing firms designed to obstruct climate action. 

The scientists also noted that examples of this continue to emerge. Earlier this week, ExxonMobil committed to reaching net-zero operational emissions by 2050, with full plans for delivery due in 2023. However, green groups have been quick to criticise Exxon’s new operational emissions targets as non-science-based. Their interim ambitions remain unchanged from updated targets first published last month, entailing a 20% reduction by 2030.

Climate scientists have repeatedly called for a 50% cut in global net emissions by 2030 to allow the best chance of capping global heating to 1.5C.

Matt Mace

© Faversham House Ltd 2022 edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.

Comments (1)

  1. Ken Pollock says:

    If the advertisements are wrong, challenge them in the courts. In Britain, use the Advertising Standards Authority. Don’t go behind the public’s back and pressurize the agencies. Do it in the open, by proving the claims are false. And remember that everything you do currently relies on the products of the fossil fuel industry and you probably have not calculated the cost – the energy cost in particular – of eliminating all fossil fuels. Plus, any letter that includes Gleick and Mann among its signatories is totally negligible.

Action inspires action. Stay ahead of the curve with sustainability and energy newsletters from edie

Subscribe