Continue Reading

Login or register for unlimited FREE access.

Login Register

Investors target Facebook, Nintendo and other business giants over climate disclosure

he 1

A coalition of 105 investors spanning 23 countries has contacted businesses that either aren’t disclosing, or have stopped disclosing, data to CDP. The group of investors include the likes of Legal & General and the New York State Common Retirement Fund.

Companies such as Nintendo, Facebook, Domino’s Pizza and Exxon Mobil have been contacted to either start or improve environmental disclosure to the CDP platform. The 1,051 companies contacted account for $8trn in market capitalisation and are estimated to emit more than 4,800 megatonnes of carbon – equal to the entire 2017 emissions levels of the US – each year.

CDP’s global director of capital markets Emily Kreps said: “The importance of investor engagement to drive disclosure cannot be overstated. Climate change, water security and deforestation present material risks to investments, and companies that are failing to disclose their impact risk trailing behind their competitors in their access to capital.”

The call to action forms part of CDP’s 2020 Non-Disclosure Campaign (NDC), which aims to increase engagement among companies that aren’t interacting with the organisation.

Of the 1,000+ companies contacted, 58% were selected by investors to improve disclosure on climate change impacts, while 30% – including Chevron – were asked to disclose on at least two key themes across CDP’s climate, forests and water data requests.

CDP has welcomed a major increase in the number of companies engaging across those key themes. In 2019, for example, 88 investors focused on 707 companies. The number of companies calling on their suppliers to disclose environmental data, for example, has increased by 24% in a year, with more than 150 organisations now taking proactive steps to gain more understanding of the environmental impacts of their supply chains.

Disclosure decisions

In the UK, climate disclosure is shaping up to be a key legislative tool on the road to net-zero emissions.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has proposed that the UK’s largest companies should disclose climate-related risks as part of a net-zero transition. The UK’s financial watchdog has unveiled proposals that would lead to 480 UK companies, worth a combined market capitalisation of £2.3trn, having to disclose relevant data to outline how they are assisting or are failing to assist with the UK’s net-zero transition.

Additionally, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has launched a major review into the quality of how companies and auditors are reporting on climate change impacts and risks, including the pace at which the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework has been adopted.

It is the latest in a string of framework introductions that suggest that climate disclosure could become mandatory in the 2020s.

The Green Finance Strategy, for example, includes expectations for publicly listed companies and asset owners to disclose climate risk and impact data by 2022 and to work with regulators as to whether this becomes a mandatory requirement.

“As the growth of this campaign shows, investors require decisive data that is consistent, comparable and comprehensive,” Kreps added. “To make this possible, they expect companies to wholeheartedly engage with TCFD-aligned standards on environmental disclosure and reporting. With business resilience and adaptation to unexpected, systemic risks exposed by the recent public health crisis, the tide is rapidly turning against companies not taking note of investor demands.”


edie’s Sustainable Investment Digital Conference

edie’s Sustainable Investment Digital Conference takes place on 7-8 September 2020 and unites corporates, asset managers and asset owners for frank discussion around disclosure priorities, roadblocks and innovations. Featuring green finance experts from the likes of ING, BlackRock and BNP Paribas, the event explores how corporates and financiers can move beyond ESG in a post-COVID world.

For more information or to register, click here: https://event.edie.net/investor/


Matt Mace

© Faversham House Ltd 2022 edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.

Comments (1)

  1. Andy Kadir-Buxton says:

    We Need a Moore’s Law for the Carbon Footprint of Computing

    In the climate crisis we have to look at how to reduce the carbon footprint of our computing. This would involve minimising green house gasses at production, use, recycling, and deconstruction at end of life. Buying our products in carbon intensive China is a suicide mission, and we can be leading the way to getting a cleaner China by ensuring that our component producing companies use renewable energy to power construction, which is now cheaper than new build fossil fuels. Factory cooling can be most cheaply done by planting trees nearby rather than having air conditioning, as Google has found to good effect. As the United Nations is attempting to plant a trillion trees, every one counts; if we plant the trees in equilateral triangles we can plant 15% more trees. (for mathematical proof see: http://www.kadir-buxton.com/crows-footing-increases-crop-yields-by-15-percent)

    We must now design our tech to use as little electricity as possible, and have a Moore s law for efficiency instead of speed. Every time there is an increase in computer speed the software becomes sloppier, we can reduce future energy consumption by improving software design, minimalism must be made to be more important than bell and whistles. Do we need a new version of our favourite game every year when a new extra difficult level could be downloaded? Bloatware must be confined to the past.

    Mobile phones are renowned for having a battery that lasts for two years, and those phones that you can replace batteries with often die soon afterwards, this cynical design flaw should be removed by law. Refurbished tech should become a standard, once we break free from the tradition of replacing our tech every three years for insurance purposes we can have a Luddite policy of producing replacement parts for old tech (have you tried to get a replacement motherboard for one that has failed only to find you need a new chip and RAM as well?) New tech and software should only be allowed if it can be proven to cut CO2 emissions in the medium term, and this would have the effect of keeping prices down.

    All of these policies would help to spread computing into the developing world, either as new, refurbished or free.

Action inspires action. Stay ahead of the curve with sustainability and energy newsletters from edie

Subscribe