Finding the green balance
Atkins-led research has used carbon footprinting to bridge the gap between water quality standards and climate change. Dr Arthur Thornton explains the results of the research carried out on behalf of the water industry.
It will impact across the majority of engineering and environmental consultancies business areas in one way or another. Programmes of measures defined by the river basin plans will need to address the potential implications of climate change, and the carbon footprint that each potential improvement may impose.
It is essential to recognise the integrated nature of the environment, and that the best solution for water quality may not necessarily be the best in terms of climate change.
Tighter Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for some chemicals will lead to tighter discharge controls at WwTWs.
Working for the water industry, Atkins has demonstrated how these tighter controls will lead to the need for infrastructure upgrade, including tertiary technology. Its research was sponsored by UKWIR, the Environment Agency, Defra and Ofwat.
The Atkins approach included the creation of a UK model of WwTW effluents and their potential impact at their discharge points to assess the treatment processes required to meet the tighter discharge controls.
These additional processes could be in the form of oxidation techniques, adsorption or filtration. They tend to be energy hungry, and have the potential of generating additional waste streams as well as greenhouse gas emissions.
Taking the example of a sand filter, carbon emissions could be expected to be in the region of tens of kilograms per megalitre treated. Scaling this up to a national level, this could mean carbon emissions in the hundreds of kilotonnes a year, increasing the water industry's annual greenhouse gas emissions by about 25%.
During the research, it became evident that some of the EQS have been set at a precautionary tight level as there was considered to be uncertainty in the data on which the EQS was being based. While the precautionary approach does not necessarily provide any benefit to the flora and fauna found in the receiving water, the tighter standards lead to the need for potentially more treatment and, therefore, an increase in carbon emissions.
Assessing a range of measures, Atkins has highlighted the need to balance the costs, treatment performance and the environmental impact of the treatment options across all facets of the environment. And it compared these impacts to those of other control measures, such as control at source.
In order to meet the UK targets for reducing carbon emissions, all sectors will need to examine their sustainable development policies and adopt targets to reduce their greenhouse gas releases. The water industry economic regulator Ofwat will publish its sustainable development policy soon, which may further drive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
The challenge is to find effective, low-carbon technology to meet the demands of the WFD, and to ensure that the standards which drive the need for new technology are set appropriately.
Dr Arthur Thornton is principal consultant, Water Resource Management, at Atkins.
T: 01226 370233