Specialists play key role in brownfield development

Craig Sillars, Managing Director of Churngold Remediation Ltd, identifies short-term concerns over brownfield development and puts the case for identifying specialist remediation contractors capable of addressing the most complex remediation issues.

The Government has introduced a number of pieces of new legislation to act as drivers for brownfield redevelopment in order to promote urban regeneration and achieve construction of 60% of new houses on sites that have had a former use. In the long term, the market for the services of specialist remediation contractors is almost certain to expand. However, at the time of writing (December 2001) the rapid implementation of the Landfill Directive, before the effect on brownfield regeneration has been properly addressed, and, in particular, the associated definition of what is "waste", may have a short detrimental effect on the remediation market.

WRAP - The Waste and Resources Action Programme - is making its presence felt with a widening range of initiatives, the latest of which, a new Business Development Service, aims to acts as "marriage service" to deliver investment in recycling.
The intention is to translate the much-vaunted good intentions many businesses express under the umbrella of "ethical investment" and "going green", into reality.

Speaking at the launch of the new scheme on 29 January, Dr Alistair Keddie, Director of Environment and Innovation Services at the DTI, highlighted the significance of WRAP's role in the Government's resource productivity agenda and the importance of the environment industry to the UK economy.

"Current estimates indicate that the global market for environmental products and services will rise from £240 billion in 2000 to £450 billion in 2010," he said. "The UK recycling sector has the opportunity to expand significantly as part of that growth, and this represents a new and exciting opportunity for the financial community."

One of WRAP's main objectives is to bolster market confidence in the recycling sector and find ways to improve the economics of recycling, including a target to lever a minimum of an additional £10 million a year into the sector.

The new Business Development Service will provide comprehensive support to recycling businesses, particularly small and medium sized enterprises, in putting together strong investment proposals and identifying the best sources of capital. It will forge strong links with the financial community, build up a network of potential investors and increase confidence in the recycling sector.

Research funding
Also last month WRAP announced £3.6 million funding for 21 major R&D research projects aimed at increasing the use of recycled material in the UK. Part of WRAP's first round of R&D projects within its Materials R&D Programme, the research will explore innovative recycling methods and new uses for recycled materials, including glass, plastics and wood. More than 60% of the funding will be provided by WRAP, which is contributing over £3.6 million towards the expected total cost of £5.6 million.

Newsprint reprocessing
In the newsprint recycling field WRAP also made its presence felt by announcing a change of the preferred bidder status of the two companies remaining in its competition for support for newsprint reprocessing capacity.

WRAP stated that Shotton Paper Company, of Deeside, North Wales, is now the preferred bidder to receive support under the competition, replacing Aylesford Newsprint, which was originally appointed preferred bidder in November 2001.

According to WRAP: "Since November, WRAP and Aylesford Newsprint have been in intensive negotiations with a view to finalising the contract for provision of financial support. At the beginning of January, Aylesford Newsprint made a significant change in the proposals they were putting forward.

"WRAP cannot provide details of that change due to the commercial confidentiality of the negotiations. However, the introduction of an additional condition to the bid led the WRAP board to conclude that Aylesford was not now in a position to execute a contract giving certainty that new capacity would be delivered within a timescale that fulfils the objectives of the competition, and therefore decided to remove their preferred bidder status."

WRAP added that its expert assessment panel shared its view.

In response, Aylesford Newsprint issued a statement saying it is reassuring local authorities and other suppliers that it is "business as usual" following the WRAP decision over the November tender competition which had been designed to increase the recycling of used newspapers and magazines.

"While we are disappointed at WRAP's decision," said Recycling Manager Chris White, "the Aylesford recycling team remains committed to helping local authorities and others achieve their recycling targets and committed to taking all the tonnage generated by local authorities who sign contracts with us. We look forward to continued and successfully relationships with these groups."
He added: "We believe, both for environmental and technical reasons, that the Aylesford site remains the right location for further investment."

Packaging prosecutions
The Environment Agency is maintaining its vigorous pursuit of companies who fail to comply with the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations.

Among recent cases reported by the Agency, in a successful prosecution on 23 January, Southampton Magistrates told a supplier of prepackaged aggregate to the construction industry, JPM Aggregates Ltd, that being ignorant of the producer responsibility regulations for packaging waste was not an acceptable excuse for failing to register.

The company confirmed that it had not been registered for the year 2000 but explained that it did not know it had to register. In mitigation it explained that it had no intention to save money by not registering.

Additionally, the company added that it had immediately registered when it realised it was an obligated producer and had given an early guilty plea. The magistrates said that they had appreciated it had been a mistake but that was not an acceptable excuse.

On 16 January 2002, Gloucestershire company Lister-Petter, of Long Street, Dursley, pleaded guilty at Stroud Magistrates to four charges relating to the company failing to meet conditions of the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 1997.

The company was fined £18,000 and ordered to pay £1,135 costs.

Speaking after the case, an Agency officer said: "UK companies produce approximately 12 million tonnes of waste packaging. The packaging regulations are aimed at reducing this quantity of waste being landfilled and promoting the recycling of packaging. It is important that every company with a turnover of over £2million as year is aware of their responsibilities under these regulations and help us to meet the UK's national target, set by the European Commission, for recycling packaging waste."



Click a keyword to see more stories on that topic, view related news, or find more related items.


You need to be logged in to make a comment. Don't have an account? Set one up right now in seconds!

© Faversham House Group Ltd 2002. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.