EA’s State of the Environment report uncovers serious flaws in our progress

This was the message underlying the Environment Agency’s report , State of the environment 2005: a better place? launched on Thursday, June 9.

The document used the most detailed and accurate data available from the past five years to look at how our environment, and what we are doing to it, had changed since the last report issued in 2000.

Looking at eight key areas, it made for bleak reading overall with land,
climate change and flooding all getting worse.

Slight improvements were recorded for wildlife, waste and use of resources though the situation there still offered little to be proud of as the 2000 starting point left a lot to be desired.

Water, air quality and the environment where we live had all seen improvements, though hidden behind this silver lining was the grey cloud of traffic pollution, waterways full of phosphates and nitrates from intensive farming and a marked difference in environmental quality between affluent and poor areas.

While read in its entirety the report should make us hang our heads in
shame, there are a few things that shine out as successes.

There have been massive cuts in pollution from regulated industry, with
suphur dioxide down by 15% and particles down by an impressive 48%.

Improved fuel and engine technology has cut nitrogen dioxide emissions from
traffic by a quarter, though an increase in car use has undermined the
technological advances to a degree.

Water quality has improved dramatically and, by and large, we are breathing cleaner air.

Introducing the document at its launch in London’s Millbank, the EA’s chairman Sir John Harman said: “Behind these 24 pages lie years of research and investigation and mountain ranges of data.

“Some of the pressures have eased, some have intensified.

“There are new challenges and our knowledge and understanding of the world around us has changed too.

“We hope this report will help industry and government and communities all over the country to look again at our impact on the environment.”

Baroness Barbara Young, chief executive of the agency, outlined the findings of the report in more details, praising industry for getting down to the job at hand and reducing emissions, cutting waste, putting a lid on pollution incidents and increasing recycling rates.

“There have been substantial reductions in pollution of most kinds from
industry and buisness,” she said.

“And we’ve got the cleanest water we’ve had for many years but there are still
issues to address, mainly to do with our ageing sewer system and run-off
from roads and farms.

“80% of British waters now meet the toughest EU standards and pollution from hazardous substances has fallen.

“But it’s not all good news, improvements are beginning to slow and fewer
than half our urban rivers are good quality.”

She analysed the reports eight categories, building up a picture of the general devastation of the environment while providing a few rays of hope.

Baroness Young on wildlife


On waste


On water


On land

On air

On where we live


On climate change


On flooding.

Overall


Baroness Young said striving for a healthier environment was in all of our interests.

“The report at its minimum is a technical compendium bringing together data
from a wide range of sources,” she said.

“But it’s got a bigger meaning for all of us.

“There’s a real cross over between environmental quality, health and
enjoyment of life.


“A good environment is good for people’s mental health and there are sound
economic arguments for a cleaner, greener environment.


“Inefficient use of materials, for example, creates unnecessary waste and costs UK business around £3billion per year.

“Our green and pleasant land is also one of our greatest assets attracting
tourism and inward investment.”

Lord Robert May, president of the Royal Society, also spoke at the launch, painting an almost apocalyptic picture of the state of the environment.


He said the few nuggets of hope in the EA’s report were by and large, fools gold, and radical action needed to be taken to address the situation before it spiralled beyond our control.


He lambasted the politicians for their ‘totally gutless avoidance of introducing legislation to try to address the issues’ and members of the scientific community for concentrating their ecological studies on ‘attractive animals, preferably in exotic locations, that reflect their own romantic image of themselves’ rather than getting their hands dirty studying soils and other little-understood disciplines.


Consumers also came under fire for absurd extravagances such as excessive packaging and criminally wasteful use of energy.

“We could halve our energy consumption without any diminutive effect on our
lives but there’s no indication we’re actually going to get down and do it,” said Lord May.

Summing up, he said the EA’s report told us what we already knew but were trying to ignore.

“We’ve got to take this seriously else future generations will pay the price for our sloth,” he said.

“We’ve never before faced such a global threat of our own creation, no species ever has.

“If we don’t begin effective action now it’s going to become much harder to stop the runaway train once it’s gathered momentum.”

By Sam Bond