|
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |
Channel Homepages
» Home
» Sustainable Business » Green Buildings » Contaminated Land » Water/Wastewater » Waste/Recycling » Energy/Carbon » edie Ireland » Resource Centres » Sustainabilitylive! Site SponsorTo see all site sponsors, click here
Supplier Links» Wastewater Treatment» Environmental Monitoring and Analysis » Water Treatment » Sludge Handling and Treatment » Cleaner Production » Corporate Social Responsibility |
10 March 2006 Protests at Coca Cola sponsorship of World Water Forum![]() Coca cola has been accused of harming India's water resources The fourth World Water Forum (Mexico City, March 16-22) aims to bring together politicians, water management professionals and NGOs to aid cooperation for "better living standards for people all over the world and a more responsible social behaviour towards water issues in-line with the pursuit of sustainable development." The Indian Resource Centre NGO says that Coca Cola is sponsoring the event as a "publicity manoeuvre" to whitewash over its record of wasteful water use and pollution. India feels the effects of the drinks giant's wasteful and polluting behaviour particularly strongly, says Amit Sirvastava of the Indian Resource Centre: "Coca-Cola's water use ratio in India is 4 to 1 - that is, 75% of the freshwater it extracts is turned into wastewater. The company has indiscriminately discharged its wastewater into the surrounding fields, severely polluting the scarce remaining groundwater as well as soil." Globally, the company's water use ratio is 2.7 to 1 on average - meaning 63% of the water it takes from the ground is discharged as waste, he says. Last year Indian courts ordered Coca Cola to close one of its plants, which they said polluted local water resources (see related story) The company has also been accused of causing water shortages through its use of almost 300 billion litres of water a year. Coca Cola defends its environmental record, saying that water is its "lifeblood" and that it aims to "invest in the sustainability of this critical resource." It says it is the "most efficient industrial water user among peer companies." By Goska Romanowicz Source: edie newsroom © Faversham House Group Ltd 2006. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded
for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
You are notlogged in » Log in here Why not register for your free weekly newsletter? Related Stories Judges in India's capital Delhi have attacked the poor standards of the city's landfill sites which are over-flowing with rubbish.» Mumbai water protests turn ugly Police and protesters have clashed over water cuts in the Indian city of Mumbai, leaving one dead and dozens injured.» At least two killed in water pipe accident At least two people have been killed when a water pipe crashed onto a packed commuter train. » Asbestos packed ship could be illegally scrapped in India Environmentalists hit out last night after it was revealed an aging American ocean liner could be scrapped in India against international law.
Related Media» Waste by WaterMark Benstead director of regeneration at British Waterways talks about boosting the use of the nations waterways for recycling.
» Huw Irranca-Davies MP - full speechThe full speech from Defra Minister Huw Irranca-Davies at the CMS Costal Futures 2010 conference.
» Defra Minister Huw Irranca-Davies talks marine policyMr Irranca-Davies addressed industry experts and academics at the CMS Costal Futures 2010 event. Marine policy seeks to find a sustainable balance between environmental and economic concerns, he said.
» See more
|
| Conference | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Editorial Finditforme | Publications Partners Links Discussions Quiz |



Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment


















» Discussion - Can we cut building emissions fast enough to meet targets?
» Discussion - Will energy meters cut climate change or are they a gimmick?