Trade Bill: UK Government votes to allow food imports with lower environmental standards

The UK Government is being accused of backtracking on non-regression pledges around post-Brexit food standards, after MPs voted against amendments to the trade bill this week.

There are particular concerns about the decision's implications for the meat sector

There are particular concerns about the decision's implications for the meat sector

Bodies including the Aldersgate Group, the National Farmers Union, WWF, Greenpeace and ClientEarth, along with big businesses like John Lewis Partnership and BASF, had been urging ministers to accept an amendment filed last month. The amendment was designed by members of the House of Lords to give MPs and Lords more of a say on the shape of all future trade deals, holding the Government to account over its non-regression commitments on environmental standards, animal welfare and protecting workers.

But a vote on the amendment on Tuesday night (19 January) came as a disappointment to proponents. 277 MPs voted in favour of the amendment but 353 MPs voted to scrap it. Only a handful of Tory MPs backed the proposed changes.

An argument put forward for scrapping the amendment was that it would slow down the process of agreeing and implementing trade deals. The Government also told MPs that there are already sufficient safeguards on standards for imported products.

But trade bodies are warning of potentially dire consequences for producers in the UK, who could lose business as cheap imports which undercut domestic standards come in.

There are also concerns about the environmental messages being sent and the potential impacts on human health. Particular sticking points include chicken treated with chlorine and similar substances; hormone-fed beef and livestock which have been over-exposed to antibiotics – thus developing resistance.

“These deals will have a far bigger impact than changing the contents of our supermarket shelves – they could make it harder to pass new legislation to protect our environment, increase the UK’s contribution to climate change, or prop up supply chains linked to human rights abuses,” Friends of the Earth campaigner Kierra Box said.

“It’s not just disappointing that our elected representatives are willing to let themselves and their constituents be satisfied – it’s mystifying.”

An unpopular move

The decision from Government is proving unpopular with big businesses as well as environmentalists. Supermarket giants including Sainsbury’s, Waitrose & Partners, the Co-op, Aldi UK and Marks & Spencer (M&S) all made public commitments last year to never stock imported chicken that does not meet domestic standards. Firms across the UK’s farming and food manufacturing sectors are also in uproar, including chicken producer Pilgrim’s Pride.

Moreover, support for high food standards and protection for UK-based farmers is high across all voting demographics in the UK, from Green Party and Labour supporters to new and long-time Conservative voters.

Ahead of the general election in 2019, the Conservative Party was widely using the slogan “get Brexit done to support British farmers”. A recent survey of 52 focus groups of first-time Conservative voters in constituencies that turned blue at the election found that most support strong food standards and see farming and trade as key issues.

Sarah George



Tags

| Brexit | Food & drink | agriculture | Green Policy | ethics

Topics

CSR & ethics | Green policy


Click a keyword to see more stories on that topic, view related news, or find more related items.

Comments

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Don't have an account? Set one up right now in seconds!


© Faversham House Ltd 2021. edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.